
Economic and geopolitical uncertainty is redefining biopharma sponsor-CDMO strategy. This Nice Insight Report draws on expert panels and proprietary analysis to examine the partnerships and market forces shaping the global CDMO landscape.
Economic and geopolitical uncertainty is redefining biopharma sponsor-CDMO strategy. This Nice Insight Report draws on expert panels and proprietary analysis to examine the partnerships and market forces shaping the global CDMO landscape.

The biopharma industry is adapting to its new reality of continued economic and geopolitical uncertainty, which is reshaping sponsor-CDMO relationships; forging partnerships founded on discipline and financial constraint. This Nice Insight Report, informed by our own insights and a series of panel discussions with industry experts, explores the shifting trends, market dynamics and ongoing innovation that will shape the global CDMO landscape in 2026 and beyond.

We’ve seen large pharma in particular consolidate their outsourcing strategies this year, often trying to keep more of their supply in the U.S. They are increasingly open to strategic models... That said, once you’re in the relationship, pharma can quickly revert to transactional behavior.”
The global therapeutic pipeline remained strong during 2025, with 43 new drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) by the end of Q3. New modalities are experiencing accelerated growth, evidenced by the fact that 8 of the 10 best-selling biopharma products in 2025 are new modality drugs (Source: BCG).



including 1 bispecific and 2 ADCs.

1 viral vector–based gene therapy, 2 gene-modified cell therapies, and 5 RNA-based therapies
During 2025, Nice Insight actively tracked over 500 CDMOs globally, an increase from the 400 CDMOs tracked in 2024. This increased CDMO coverage is the result of a focused landscape analysis to better map the small molecule active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), oral solid dose (OSD), and sterile fill/finish CDMO sectors.





The political agenda in the U.S. for reshoring of API manufacturing presents both significant opportunities and challenges for U.S.-based CDMOs. The various capital investments promised in 2025 by large pharma will take several years to be fully realized, so in the short-term the reshoring policy is likely to drive demand for domestic manufacturing services to already established and operational CDMOs.”
Every panel, regardless of modality, returned to a single recurring constraint: even when funding is available and infrastructure exists, the work can only move as fast as qualified people allow it to.
It has evolved into a structural limitation that threatens to slow regionalization and stall innovation. Rapid facility expansion across the United States and Europe — spurred by tariffs, onshoring incentives, and diversification away from China — has outpaced the available labor pool.


You can add bioreactors faster than you can train operators. Projects are increasingly constrained by the availability of people rather than equipment or capital. The most acute pain points are in high-skill areas, such as aseptic manufacturing, analytical development, and viral-vector processing, where hands-on expertise cannot be quickly replaced by automation.”
As budgets and timelines shrink, CDMOs have had to step up to become true strategic partners to their customers, functioning as extensions of their clients’ internal R&D and manufacturing departments. This has resulted in a shift in pricing strategy and dynamics in the outsourcing market. Understanding the nuances of CDMO pricing is critical for clients, investors and competitors seeking a competitive edge in 2026 and beyond.






2025’s pricing dynamics reveal a global recalibration: sponsors seek flexibility, CDMOs seek strategic partnerships, and patients wait for affordability to catch up with discovery. The tension between innovation and access sharpens, but it also inspires new models, shared risk, performance-based contracts, and global supply harmonization. As we enter 2026, pricing power now stems from scarcity of expertise, specialized infrastructure, and regulatory mastery, not from scale alone.”
In 2025, CDMOs that specialize in early clinical-phase development and manufacturing of mRNA-based products faced significant headwinds that are expected to remain throughout 2026. Many mRNA-focused CDMOs were competing for a very limited number of clients, resulting in the need to restructure resources and operations or shut down completely during 2025.

There are 124 CDMOs offering RNA based services; this represents an expansion from 79 companies in 2024, but a reduction in single focus specialization (from 37% in 2024 to 25% in 2025)
CDMOs offering synthetic RNA services are proving slightly more resilient due to different cost structures involved in running synthetic vs IVT approaches.


2025 has been a bleak year for mRNA CDMOs. The funding landscape hit emerging mRNA therapeutic developers particularly hard in 2024, and in 2025 a dwindling preclinical pipeline shrunk even further. Add to that the U.S. government termination of vaccine research programs, and larger-scale mRNA projects also came under threat.”


The maxim of AAV for in vivo and LVV for in vitro is set to be challenged over the next couple of years, as limitations in the size of payload that can be packaged into an AAV become more problematic, while molecular design of LVV moves towards optimization for in vivo use. CDMOs who want to get ahead of this trend should start thinking about efficient scale-up for LVV manufacture, as required batch sizes increase for in vivo use.”

Overall, 2025 has emerged as a year of pragmatic execution under persistant constraint. The anticipated investment rebound never materialized; instead, sponsors and CDMOs alike accepted that they could no longer wait for more favorable capital conditions.

2026 is expected to bring a gradual consolidation around resilience and specialization. Sponsors are increasingly drawn to CDMOs that demonstrate depth rather than breadth and can offer measurable expertise in HPAPI containment, ADC payload–linker conjugation, complex sterile/device integration, or vector-specific CGT manufacturing.
However, even the most grounded predictions come with caveats. The global CDMO market remains sensitive to policy swings and technological inflection points that could rapidly alter today’s equilibrium.


In 2026, the global CDMO market will pivot on three critical axes: technological sophistication, capacity resilience, and transformative challenges. Success will favour CDMOs that marry technological agility with operational robustness and strategic foresight.”
Nice Insight is the market research division of That's Nice LLC, A Science Agency.
Visit our website at niceinsight.com
© Nice Insight 2025
New York | Chicago | Bristol | Raleigh | Oklahoma City | San Diego | Houston | London | Manchester | Frankfurt | Hangzhou